LCA & material health results & interpretation Undercounter Lavatory LT569
Scope and summary
- Cradle to gate
- Cradle to gate with options
- Cradle to grave
Functional unit
One lavatory in an average U.S. commercial environment that functions for 20 years. 20 years is modeled as the period of application based on the average economical lifespan for commercial applications. The technical lifespan is longer. The economical lifespan of commercial applications can be longer or lower due to esthetic replacements or more intense use. The implication is that the LCA model assumes that the application ends at year 20 and that the materials will be treated in an end-of-life scenario.
ULE Part B specifies the functional unit for all sanitary ceramic products as 1 t of product. The conversion factor from 1 t to 1 kg of product is 0.001. To make the impact results more understandable, a conversion factor of 0.00821 was applied to deliver impact results per one lavatory weighing 8.21 kg.
Reference service life: 20 years
Data reporting period: 2013
Default use phase scenario
20 years of service in an average U.S. commercial environment including regular cleaning with 10 mL of a 10% sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) solution resulting in 73 kg of SLS.
What’s causing the greatest impacts
All life cycle stages
The use stage and the production stage are both important and dominate the results for all impact categories. The impact of the use stage is due to the cleaning agents required for maintenance of the product. The production stage has the most significant contributions to ozone depletion and carcinogenics. The contributions covered under the construction stage are associated with the transportation by truck for delivery to the market. This stage has a contribution of up to 8% to the impact categories and is mostly critical to ecotoxicity and smog. The recovery stage includes recycling processes and benefits by preventing the need to produce primary materials. Recycling is a relevant factor for some of the impact categories, offsetting a portion of the impacts caused by production. Additionally, the processes for dismantling the product and final waste treatment during the end of life stage are slightly irrelevant in the majority of the impact categories.
Production stage
The ceramic parts dominate the material contribution for most of the impact categories. The ceramic parts dominate all impact categories, with the exception of ecotoxicity, eutrophication, carcinogenics, and non-carcinogenics. Truck transport is relevant to all categories except ozone depletion. Stainless steel is a significant contributor to ecotoxicity, carcinogenics, non-carcinogenics, and respiratory effects. Lead is most relevant in the non-carcinogenic category. Corrugated board is also relevant to most impact categories, especially eutrophication. Turning steel is somewhat relevant to many of the impact categories, especially carcinogenics, non-carcinogenics, and respiratory effects. Paper used for this product has very little impact to each category.
Sensitivity analysis
There are no sensitivity results that lead to variations greater than 10% in the LCA results.
TOTO PeoplePlanetWater™ programs improving environmental performance
- Dual-Max®, E-Max®, Tornado Flush™, 1G®, and EcoPower® reduce water consumption in the use phase
- Energy efficiency programs optimize the firing process
- 50% electricity from renewable energy
- 100% of post-industrial ceramic waste is recycled
LCA results
Life cycle stage | Production | Construction | Use | End of Life | Recovery |
Information modules: Included | Excluded* ** Operational energy and water use are assigned to the faucet used in combination with the lavatory; therefore, no operational energy and water use are applied to the life cycle of the modeled product. |
A1 Raw Materials | A4 Transporation/ Delivery | B1 Use | C1 Deconstruction/ Demolition* | D Reuse, recovery and/or recycling |
A2 Transportation | A5 Construction/ Installation* | B2 Maintenance | C2 Transportation | ||
A3 Manufacturing | B3 Repair | C3 Waste processing | |||
B4 Replacement | C4 Disposal | ||||
B5 Refurbishment | |||||
B6 Operational energy use** | |||||
B7 Operational water use** | |||||
SM Single Score
Learn about SM Single Score resultsImpacts per 20 years of service | 1.84 mPts | 0.32 mPts | 9.43 mPts | 0.01 mPts | -0.25 mPts |
Materials or processes contributing >20% to total impacts in each life cycle stage | Ceramic parts production as well as well zinc and brass parts together with zinc turning process. | Transportation of the product to installation site or consumer and disposal of packaging. | Volume of water use during the operation of the product and the embedded energy use (such as electricity) in the water used. | Transport to waste processing, waste processing and disposal of material flows transported to a landfill. | Plastic and metal components' recycling processes. |
TRACI v2.1 results per one lavatory
Life cycle stage | Production | Construction | Use | End of Life | Recovery |
Ecological damage
Human health damage
Resources depletion
Impact category | Unit | |||||
Fossil fuel depletion | MJ surplus Mega Joule surplus Fossil fuel depletion is the surplus energy to extract minerals and fossil fuels. |
3.41E+01 | 6.14E+00 | 2.04E+02 | 3.24E-01 | -8.15E-01 |
References
LCA Background Report
TOTO Sanitary Ceramic Products – Commercial Wall Hung Lavatory and Commercial Undercounter Lavatory LCA Background Report, TOTO 2015; SimaPro 8. WAP Sustainability verified the LCA to ISO 14040-44 and the ULE PCR for Building-Related Products Services for NSF International.
ULE PCR for Building-Related Products and Services
Adapted for UL Environment from the range of Environ-mental Product Declarations of Institute Construction and Environment e.V. (IBU); PCR review conducted by the Independent Expert Committee (SVR)
Part A: Calculation Rules for the Life Cycle Assessment and Requirements on the Project Report, v1.3, June 2014
Part B: Requirements on the EPD for Sanitary Ceramics, v5, July 2014
UL/USGBC Guidance: Enhanced EPD: Requirements for PCR
This SM Transparency Report conforms to the requirements of the USGBC Enhanced EPD Requirements for PCRs.
SM Transparency Reports enable purchasers and users to compare the environmental performance of products on a life cycle basis. They are designed to present information transparently to make the limitations of comparability more understandable. SM Transparency Reports of products that comply with the same Product Group Definition (PGD) or PCR and include the same life cycle stages, but are made by different manufacturers, may not sufficiently align to support direct comparisons. They therefore, cannot be used as comparative assertions unless the conditions defined in ISO 14025 Section 6.7.2. ‘Requirements for Comparability’ are satisfied.
EN ISO 14025:2011-10: Environmental labels and declarations — Type III environmental declarations — Principles and procedures.